<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Improving XFS unlink() performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seife.kernalert.de/blog/2009/05/28/improving-xfs-unlink-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seife.kernalert.de/blog/2009/05/28/improving-xfs-unlink-performance/</link>
	<description>Move on, nothing to see here.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: [SOLVED] uniterruplible sleep mode for an rm process</title>
		<link>http://seife.kernalert.de/blog/2009/05/28/improving-xfs-unlink-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-16957</link>
		<dc:creator>[SOLVED] uniterruplible sleep mode for an rm process</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seife.kernalert.de/blog/?p=89#comment-16957</guid>
		<description>[...] http://seife.kernalert.de/blog/2009/...k-performance/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://seife.kernalert.de/blog/2009/...k-performance/" rel="nofollow">http://seife.kernalert.de/blog/2009/&#8230;k-performance/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manik Taneja</title>
		<link>http://seife.kernalert.de/blog/2009/05/28/improving-xfs-unlink-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-10230</link>
		<dc:creator>Manik Taneja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seife.kernalert.de/blog/?p=89#comment-10230</guid>
		<description>thank you this really helped. 

i was originally refering to the article posted here:
 
http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1479435 but I did not see a whole lot of improvement on my system. However, mounting with the logbsize option i managed to get almost a 10 fold improvement in both the delete and random create performance. 

I'm running on tests on a 250G SATA drive on an ubuntu 8.02 64-bit server with a 2.6.24-19 kernel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you this really helped. </p>
<p>i was originally refering to the article posted here:</p>
<p><a href="http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1479435" rel="nofollow">http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1479435</a> but I did not see a whole lot of improvement on my system. However, mounting with the logbsize option i managed to get almost a 10 fold improvement in both the delete and random create performance. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m running on tests on a 250G SATA drive on an ubuntu 8.02 64-bit server with a 2.6.24-19 kernel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristian Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://seife.kernalert.de/blog/2009/05/28/improving-xfs-unlink-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-8695</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristian Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seife.kernalert.de/blog/?p=89#comment-8695</guid>
		<description>Note that "noatime" implies "nodiratime".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that &#8220;noatime&#8221; implies &#8220;nodiratime&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

